> there comes a point where your tinkering needs do not need to be supported in main.
Linux's master branch is actually called master. Not that it really matters either way (hopefully most people have realised by now that it was never really 'non-inclusive' to normal people) but pays to be accurate.
What is meant by inclusive here? I'm having trouble following this comment other than the clarification to the name.
I wish there were strong enough words to tell you about how few shits I give about the name of a branch.
> Not that it really matters either way
But you still decided to make it your personal battle to make a comment remind people that the evil inclusive people did a no no by forcing you to rename your branches from master to main, yes.
>pays to be accurate.
No, it doesn't. Source: you knew exactly what I was talking about when I said main. You also would have known what I was talking about had I said trunk, master, develop or latest.
This seems like a dumb thing to be pedantic about, actually