alt Hacker News>trying to pass a European bill aimed at stopping child sexual abuse material from spreading online.
I wouldn’t call that neutral.
>trying to pass a European bill aimed at stopping child sexual abuse material from spreading online.
I wouldn’t call that neutral.
Why?
That's what the bill's intentions are.
If you think it won't work or not be effective that doesn't change the stated intention.
If you think one or more of the proponents are lying that doesn't change what the article should state unless there is evidence
They already said "aimed at" which implies that's the goal instead of writing "that will stop child..."
It's not an opinion piece they are simplifying conveying information from both sides. The article even details that there is an opposition to the bill.