alt Hacker NewsThe article started really well, and I was looking forward to the empirical argument.
Truly mind-boggling times where "here is the empirical proof" means "here is what chatGPT says" to some people.
The article started really well, and I was looking forward to the empirical argument.
Truly mind-boggling times where "here is the empirical proof" means "here is what chatGPT says" to some people.
Better than "according to Google" (pre ai) which I saw cited too many times.
I have a feeling that people who have such absolute trust in AI models have never hit regen and seen how much truth can vary.