alt Hacker NewsI'll add the amount should be enough to cover at least a cursory review. A full review would be better. I just don't want to price out small players.
The papers could also be categorized as unreviewed, quick check, fully reviewed, or fully reproduced. They could pay for this to be done or verified. Then, we have a reputational problem to deal with on the reviewer side.
Replies
slashdave • last Saturday at 9:45 PM
> I'll add the amount should be enough to cover at least a cursory review.
You might be vastly underestimating the cost of such a feature
➕ show 1 reply
I don't know about CS, but in mathematics the vast majority of researchers would not have enough funding to pay for a good quality full review of their articles. The peer review system mostly runs on good will.