alt Hacker NewsIf you're operating your reasoning in a moral framework where helping the bad agents is a good outcome, then you'd be right. I personally do not, however.
If you're operating your reasoning in a moral framework where helping the bad agents is a good outcome, then you'd be right. I personally do not, however.
If your moral framework is supporting a nominally good "solution" with no evidence (where if your evidence that your assertion the solution is "proven"?) is "a good outcome", pointing out the solution is flawed, with evidence, is somehow not, then you'd be right. I personally do not share your nominal goodness compass, however.