logoalt Hacker News

cogman10last Sunday at 11:05 PM3 repliesview on HN

Cars really messed a lot of that up.

In the 1900s every city was walkable. Most cities had trains of some sort for the majority of transport and bikes or horses for the last mile.

It really makes me sad to see even old cartoons showing off the tram systems of the day. Those all got pulled up for "progress" thrusting us all backwards into bumper to bumper traffic.

Whats incredible is that happened almost immediately after expansion of personal vehicles.


Replies

bobthepandayesterday at 1:36 AM

Romanticizing horses, specifically, is a very rose colored glasses situation. At the turn of the last century, cities were getting overwhelmed by thousands of tons of horse feces, a similar volume of their urine, and the carcasses of overworked horses dropping dead in the street.

show 1 reply
bluGillyesterday at 12:11 AM

That is looking at the past through rose colored glasses. Walkable cities are too small to have the wealth of options a car (or transit) city does.

trains are nice but cars were faster for most (until congestion - but by then there were so few users that service was bad)

show 3 replies
cyberaxyesterday at 12:43 AM

> In the 1900s every city was walkable. Most cities had trains of some sort for the majority of transport and bikes or horses for the last mile.

Not the "last mile". The _only_ mile. Cities were so walkable that London had multiple distinct local accents because people were living their entire lives in one neighborhood, venturing outside only for special occasions.

This changed only with the invention of electric trams that allowed people to relatively cheaply move around. Technically, horse-driven trams were invented a bit earlier but they never got built at scale.

show 1 reply