> An A.I smarter than a Nobel prize winner.

I don't even know what this means.

If we assembled the sum total of all published human knowledge on a storage medium and gave a computer the ability to search it extremely well in order to answer any question falling within its domain, there, you would have a Nobel Prize beating "A.I".

But this is as "earth-shattering" (/s) as the idea that human knowledge can be stored outside the brain (on paper, flash drives, etc), or that the answer to complex questions can be deterministic.

And then there is the fact that this Noble winner beating "A.I" is highly unlikely to propound any ground-breaking novel ways of thinking and promote and explain it to general acceptance.