alt Hacker NewsDunno why electroly is dragging me into this but I believe you've misread the article. When it says "His languages take significantly after APL" it means the languages themselves and not their implementations.
Dunno why electroly is dragging me into this but I believe you've misread the article. When it says "His languages take significantly after APL" it means the languages themselves and not their implementations.
The article: "Let's make sense of the C code by the APL guy"
Do you think the article meant to say it was more likely that the code wasn't inspired by APL?