logoalt Hacker News

slglast Sunday at 9:41 PM2 repliesview on HN

Here is what was said that prompted my initial reply:

>When a model is censored for "AI safety", what they really mean is brand safety.

The equivalent analogy wouldn't be Fords and BMWs driving off a cliff, they effectively said that Ford and BMW only install safety features in their cars to protect their brand with the implication that no one at these companies actually cares about the safety of actual people. That is an incredibly cynical and amoral worldview and it appears to be the dominate view of people on HN.

Once again, you can say that specific AI safety features are stupid or aren't worth the tradeoff. I would have never replied if the original comment said that. I replied because the original comment dismissed the motivations behind these AI safety features.


Replies

buu700last Sunday at 10:42 PM

I read that as a cynical view of the motivations of corporations, not humans. Even if individuals have good faith beliefs in "AI 'safety'", and even if some such individuals work for AI companies, the behaviors of the companies themselves are ultimately the product of many individual motivations and surrounding incentive structures.

To the extent that a large corporation can be said to "believe" or "mean" anything, that seems like a fair statement to me. It's just a more specific case of pointing out that for-profit corporations as entities are ultimately motivated by profit, not public benefit (even if specific founders/employees/shareholders are individually motivated by certain ideals).

show 1 reply
int_19hlast Sunday at 10:50 PM

Organizations don't have a notion of morality; only people do.

The larger an organization is, and the more bureaucratized it is, the less morality of individual people in it affects it overall operation.

Consequently, yes, it is absolutely true that Ford and BMW as a whole don't care about safety of actual people, regardless of what individual people working for them think.

Separately, the nature of progression in hierarchical organizations is basically a selection for sociopathy, so the people who rise to the top of large organizations can generally be assumed to not care about other people, regardless of what they claim in public.