alt Hacker NewsThe LLM is doing what its lawyers asked it to do. It has no responsibility for a room full of disadvantaged indigenous people that might be or probably won't be be murdered by a psychotic, none whatsoever. but it absolutely 100% must deliver on the shareholder value and if it uses that racial epithet it opens the makers to litigation. When has such litigation ever been good for shareholder value?
Yet another example of don't hate the player, hate the game IMO. And no I'm not joking, this is how the world works now. And we built it. Don't mistake that for me liking the world the way it is.
Replies
More than just epitet's is if it gives bad advice. Telling someone they're safe to X and then they die or severely injure themselves.
Saying that not sure why people feel the need for them to say epitets, what value does it bring to anyone, let alone shareholders.
This reminds me of a hoax from the Yes Men [1]. They convinced temporarily the BBC that a company agreed to a compensation package for the victims of a chemical disaster, which resulted in a 4.23 percent decrease of the share price of the company. When it was revealed that it was a hoax, the share price returned to its initial price.
[1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20110305151306/http://articles.c...