[flagged]
To be clear, I don't really have a problem with using AIs as a possible starting point. If they have citations for example, you can check those and make sure the AI isn't making things up, or sometimes they can point you in the right general direction of things to research and verify. But using them directly as a source is just nonsensical.
Its wild that you post that, like its hard to look things up or that you provided anything close to fact check yourself. People with your level of information literacy is going to be the end of us all.
Definitely not by asking a non-deterministic tool to do it for you.
reliable sources is a good start
You mean other than asking Elon's MechaHitler?
Well you might start with more reliable sources such as horoscopes or tarot readings, and then build up from there.
I'm sorry, you think asking the lying machines is a good way to fact check something?
Ask the LLM for information about your topic of choice along with supporting citations. Skim the cited publications to make sure that they exist and actually support the information produced by the LLM. Assuming that the citations pass your checks, post links to them here along with excerpts.
Human-verified information from credible publications is a good thing to share here, whether you originally came across the information from books, search engines, or LLMs. Sharing LLM output by itself is discouraged here.