logoalt Hacker News

bsdertoday at 12:16 AM1 replyview on HN

You can block the specific offending IPs without collateral damage.

CGNATs reuse IPs so any IP block rule fairly quickly becomes somebody else's IP that you shouldn't be blocking.

If, however, you use IPv6, you don't need CGNAT and, while addresses may change, a blocked address won't suddenly get recycled to an unsuspecting user. In addition, if the allocation is static, you can block the whole network range and the problematic devices can't change their allocation sufficiently to escape the IP block.


Replies

mrweaseltoday at 7:59 AM

While it would allow us to be more specific with the IPs, it would entail blocking 500.000 IPs, or more. That quickly becomes unmanageable as well.

What I'd love to see is a service where websites could report abuse to ISPs, who would then take the misbehaving customers offline, until their system or behavior is fixed. Right now there's zero incentives to take customers offline, neither for ISP, nor cloud providers.

show 1 reply