logoalt Hacker News

d--byesterday at 7:25 PM5 repliesview on HN

IIRC, it's also why the leap day was set to Feb 29th in the first place. At the time (romans?) the year started March 1st.

In case someone was wondering why in the world someone said we should add a day to the second month of the year...


Replies

jcranmeryesterday at 11:09 PM

The calendar was regularized to include a leap day during the reign of Julius Caesar (hence the name "Julian calendar"), which would have been 45 BC.

The Roman calendar moved to January as the first month of the year in 153 BC, over a hundred years before the leap day was added. The 10-month calendar may not have even existed--we see no contemporary evidence of its existence, only reports of its existence from centuries hence and the change there is attributed to a mythical character.

show 5 replies
variagayesterday at 8:07 PM

That's correct, the Romans had March as the first month of the year, so leap day was the last day of the year and September, October, November and December were the 7th (sept), 8th (oct), ninth (nov) and 10th (dec) months.

show 1 reply
amenghrayesterday at 8:07 PM

And (oct)ober was the 8th month of the year, (nov)ember the ninth, (dec)ember the tenth!

show 2 replies
wizzwizz4yesterday at 11:28 PM

Technically, the leap day (bissextus) was the 24th. (Wikipedia tells me this is because that's when Mercedonius used to be, before the Julian reforms.)