logoalt Hacker News

fookerlast Wednesday at 9:10 PM6 repliesview on HN

> Space is so ridiculously big that I don't think it will ever happen

You are underestimating acceleration. To travel and come to a stop at 4.2 light years, a spaceship with 1g acceleration barely needs 3.5 years in relativistic ship time (~6 years earth time).

The technology to sustain 1g acceleration through 3.5 years is a different story, but very much within our understanding of physics (and not warp drives, etc). 20-50 years of engineering can get us there.


Replies

georgefrownylast Wednesday at 9:26 PM

> 20-50 years of engineering can get us there.

I want to believe, but I think it'll be a lot more than that. The rocket equation is a stone cold bitch in this case.

Sustaining the thrust that accelerates a probe at 1g is very different to sustaining the thrust to move the probe and all the fuel. And it's much worse if you want to stop and not just fly past into deep space.

show 1 reply
brookman64klast Wednesday at 9:26 PM

I think you are way too optimistic. Even with an antimatter drive and 100% conversion efficiency, such rocket would have a fuel to payload ratio of >1000.

show 1 reply
mvkellast Wednesday at 9:48 PM

Whatever speed advancements we make on earth, they pale in comparison to sling shotting off of a planet. to make an engine that can go significantly faster, we would need the energy of a planet.

show 1 reply
stickfigurelast Wednesday at 9:25 PM

> 20-50 years of engineering can get us there.

What energy source do you think is merely 20-50 years of engineering effort away from being able to power that kind of journey?

show 1 reply
beAbUlast Wednesday at 9:58 PM

Is there enough reaction mass on earth to construct a rocket capable of accelerating at 1g for 3.5 years?

show 1 reply
christkvlast Wednesday at 9:27 PM

You got the shielding problem how to protect the ship from disintegrating when it hits the first pebble at massive speed

show 1 reply