logoalt Hacker News

bitbasher • today at 1:59 AM • 4 replies • view on HN

I'm happy to see the move. Codeberg is probably a more stable/long-term solution than SourceHut as the founder is slightly unhinged (but love what he has built). Honestly, either would have been great choices.

More opensource projects should move off GitHub. I moved off it myself.

Replies

the__alchemist • today at 1:36 PM

I am getting fatigued by all of these. I am learning about a new one each time. We have

  - GitHub
  - BinCode
  - GitLab
  - SourceHut
  - CodeBerg
They all seem to do roughly the same things, but with a different web UI. Competition is great! Especially in response to a big corp that has market share. But... there was value in the centralization of GH.
➕ show 2 replies
yoyohello13 • today at 2:09 AM

I’m pretty sure Drew has stepped away from SourceHut. It’s kind of a bummer SourceHut stuck so stubbornly to mailing list only workflows. Everything else about the platform is great.

➕ show 3 replies
gwerbret • today at 2:22 AM

> I'm happy to see the move. Codeberg is probably a more stable/long-term solution than SourceHut as the founder is slightly unhinged

What's this about?

➕ show 2 replies
xvilka • today at 1:20 PM

Biggest problem of SourceHut that should be solved first before mass migration of open source - lack of the organizations that would allow multiple contributors working on the project, especially the project with multiple repositories.