logoalt Hacker News

ehntotoday at 2:53 AM1 replyview on HN

What do you find lacking in tooling in that regard?

I don't think there is all that much friction in distributing git, it's one of the easiest tools to have multiple remotes on. The auxiliary tooling is all open source too, so not much in the way of hosting your own, or for hosted platforms offering the services.

The social aspect of the hosted platforms is unlikely to ever be distributed because that is basically githubs only differentiation.


Replies

tonymettoday at 6:26 AM

I think OP means multiplying n repos by m hosts and you get nXm assets out of sync , and lots of manual labor keeping track

A managed update service could work to replicate and then raise an error during conflicts . Call it “agentic” and you might get $75m