A blanket ban on LLM-generated code is a completely reasonable position. If someone couldn't be bothered to write the code, why should anyone else bother to read it, let alone merge it?

Not wanting to review and maintain code that someone didn't even bother to write themselves is childish?

I don't see how the two are related at all. A blanket ban on LLM-generated code is at least arguably a reasonable policy.

Given my own experience working on compiler stuff with LLM, I'd say it's a very good decision.

LLMs jump at the first opportunity to use regex for EVERYTHING instead of doing proper lexing/parsing, for example. You need to repeatedly tell it not to use regex. In the end you might as well hand write your code, because you actually know how it works, unlike a clueless LLM.

No wonder they moved to Codeberg. Those kinds of projects tend to do the ol' move to Codeberg for whatever reason. If I had to put an analogy to it, Codeberg is like Kick and Github is like Twitch.