alt Hacker NewsThe only good thing about it is their very generous limits for "open source" projects (it doesn't even have to be free software AFAIK, just the source has to be visible to everyone).
The CI service itself is an absolute trash fire caused by the usual Microsoft NIH, and if they have financial means not to deal with it anymore, I see no reason for them to waste their limited development time on dealing with it.
Replies
bytehowl • today at 3:25 PM
>it doesn't even have to be free software AFAIK, just the source has to be visible to everyone
With the implication that MS is free to harvest it for LLM training?
Where else would the CI service for a Microsoft product be invented? NIH is a weird insult in this context. If Microsoft had instead acquired a CI service you’d be complaining about how they’re reducing competition.