logoalt Hacker News

Helmut10001today at 10:24 AM2 repliesview on HN

I wouldn't say that being new is an absolute requirement. I recently upgraded my ZFS pool from SATA to SAS HDDs. Since SAS HDDs have much better firmware for early error detection and monitoring, I decided to buy 50% refurbished. Even if I lost half of them, I would still be safe. I also have offsite backups. This setup worked really well for me, and I feel completely confident that my data is safe while not wasting unnecessary resources. Whether to use new or used equipment therefore depends on the setup.


Replies

cm2187today at 10:35 AM

Agree, but that's taking a risk with your data (whereas if a MB fails, you likely just need to replace it but your data is fine), and HDD kind of have a finite number of hours in them. Where buying them used I think makes sense is for a backup server, that you leave off except the few hours in a week where you do an incremental backup. Then it doesn't really matter that the drives have already been running for 3 or 4 years.

show 1 reply
Glemkloksdjftoday at 10:57 AM

So you buy used enterprise disks because their error detection is 'better'?

Do you have any source for this claim? Why would be the firmware so different? Software is cheap i don't think they would be that different.

I mean a used enterprise disk gets sold after it was running on heavy load for a long time. Any consumer hdd will have a lot less runtime than enterprise disks.

show 1 reply