> So much vague outrage over nothing.

So you just chose to ignore the technical problems we have with GitHub Actions and then say there are no problems. That's certainly a take.

> That CI system created by so called monkeys is the one of the best free CI service in the world.

We self-host all our CI machines so the "free" hosted runners have no relevance here.

> Not everyone has the millions of dollars like Zig Foundation to create their own CI servers.

We don't have "millions of dollars". If only!

I'd also note that we spend our money very efficiently; most of our CI machines are consumer-grade hardware hosted in team member's homes. We don't just throw endless amounts of money at cloud providers.

> After that they appreciate GitHub Sponsors, but say it is now a complete liability just because a project leader left. What are the actual changes? Any new rule? But no, it is now a "liability" and we should accept it.

GitHub Sponsors is a liability because Microsoft can increase their cut at any time, or even axe it outright if they don't think it's profitable for them anymore. This risk is very real considering that, as Andrew pointed out, the feature has been neglected for years. It is objectively less risky for us to have donors use a platform like Every.org.