logoalt Hacker News

zozbot234today at 4:00 PM2 repliesview on HN

There was certainly quite a bit of deep talk about "integrity" and "character" in our grandfathers' generation, that was ultimately relating to issues we would now comprise under so-called 'mental health'. It's not clear to me that this medicalized framing ("...health") is necessarily and consistently better than a more traditional one focused on developing a well-adjusted character.


Replies

PaulRobinsontoday at 4:05 PM

Integrity and character are about values and how you plan to behave and expect to have others behave towards you. They are not the same as your ability to process emotions that emerge as a result of that behaviour.

Having values is important. Integrity, humility, all of that, absolutely useful.

They are not in themselves sufficient to assure you of good mental health.

show 1 reply
Izkatatoday at 7:01 PM

Some other old-fashioned-y terms in this context: "strength" and "fortitude".

Men generally process negative emotions in private so others don't worry about them. This has led to the incorrect common viewpoint that men don't process these emotions at all, and attempts to make men process them like women do.