alt Hacker NewsIn particular, conference papers are already extremely formulaic, organized in a particular way and using a lot of the same stock phrasings and terms of art. AI or not, it's hard to tell them apart.
In particular, conference papers are already extremely formulaic, organized in a particular way and using a lot of the same stock phrasings and terms of art. AI or not, it's hard to tell them apart.
Its the reviews that were found to be AI, not the papers themselves. The papers were just 1% AI according to the tool, so it seems to work properly.
> AI or not, it's hard to tell them apart.
Apparently not for this tool.