alt Hacker News> This would neither pass a review, nor static analysis
I beg to differ. Humans are fallible. Static analysis of C++ cannot catch all cases and humans will often accept a change that passes the analyses.
> This would neither pass a review, nor static analysis
I beg to differ. Humans are fallible. Static analysis of C++ cannot catch all cases and humans will often accept a change that passes the analyses.
> Static analysis of C++ cannot catch all cases
You're ignoring how static analysis can be made to err on the side of safety rather than promiscuity.
Specifically, for optional dereferencing, static analysis can be made to disallow it unless it can prove the optional has a value.