logoalt Hacker News

stefstoday at 9:36 AM3 repliesview on HN

While it's true that it was possible to support a family on a single unskilled laborer income in the '50s, their standard of living was far below anything most people would accept today.


Replies

tonyedgecombetoday at 12:19 PM

>While it's true that it was possible to support a family on a single unskilled laborer income in the '50s

I'm not even sure that is true. Poverty in the US was higher in the fifties and sixties.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States#/...

fpolingtoday at 10:54 AM

A single income family in US with the husband working at a factory in fifties and sixties could afford a home with washing machine, dish washer, TV and a phone. Surely the home was smaller, but it was easier to clean, the TV screen was tiny, but then the family can go to a cinema. There was no internet, but for information one could go to the library. So how it was far below what people in US could accept today?

show 2 replies
immibistoday at 1:30 PM

Depends how you measure, surely. They had less TVs and computers and prepackaged food, the same amount of sunlight, and more freedom (as measured by average income to rent ratio).