logoalt Hacker News

diathtoday at 2:55 PM4 repliesview on HN

Isn't that pretty much GitLab? But then most people still prefer GitHub anyway.


Replies

iamnotheretoday at 3:38 PM

GitLab is too heavyweight for many projects. It’s great for corporations or big organizations like GNOME, but it’s slow and difficult to administer. It has an important place in the ecosystem, but I doubt many small projects will choose it over simpler alternatives like Codeberg.

hshdhdhj4444today at 3:00 PM

Gitlab is worse than GitHub in every way.

At least GitHub adds new features over time.

Gitlab has been removing features in favor of more expensive plans even after explicitly saying they wouldn’t do so.

show 3 replies
the__alchemisttoday at 3:00 PM

Gitlab is part of the reason I'm thinking along these lines: It has been around for a while, as a known, reasonably popular alternative to GitHub. So, I expected the announcement to be "We moved to GitLab", Yet, what I observe is "We moved to CodeHouse" or "We moved to Source-Base" The self-hosting here with mirrors to two one I'm not familiar with is another direction.

show 1 reply
blibbletoday at 3:05 PM

gitlab has also gone full slop