Isn't that pretty much GitLab? But then most people still prefer GitHub anyway.
Gitlab is worse than GitHub in every way.
At least GitHub adds new features over time.
Gitlab has been removing features in favor of more expensive plans even after explicitly saying they wouldn’t do so.
Gitlab is part of the reason I'm thinking along these lines: It has been around for a while, as a known, reasonably popular alternative to GitHub. So, I expected the announcement to be "We moved to GitLab", Yet, what I observe is "We moved to CodeHouse" or "We moved to Source-Base" The self-hosting here with mirrors to two one I'm not familiar with is another direction.
gitlab has also gone full slop
GitLab is too heavyweight for many projects. It’s great for corporations or big organizations like GNOME, but it’s slow and difficult to administer. It has an important place in the ecosystem, but I doubt many small projects will choose it over simpler alternatives like Codeberg.