If they open source just weights and not the training code and data, then it’s still proprietary.
Isn't that a bit like saying that if I open source a tool, but not a full compendium of all the code that I had read, which led me to develop it, then it's not really open source?
True. But the headline says open weights.
It's just open weights, the source has no place in this expression
you are absolutely right. I'd rather use true closed models, not fake open source ones from China.
Stop kvetching and read the submission title.