That's how it works. You can be morally righteous all you want, but this isn't a movie. Morality is a luxury for the rich. Conspicuous consumption. The morally righteous poor people just generally end up righteously starving.
This seems rather black and white.
Defining the morals probably makes sense, then evaluating whether they can be lived or whether we can compromise in the face other priorities?
This seems rather black and white. Defining the morals probably makes sense, then evaluating whether they can be lived or whether we can compromise in the face other priorities?