I would ask that you more carefully and neutrally reread my comment. Your questions do not match up with what I actually wrote. You seem to have injected your own uncharitable interpretations rather than commenting on what I wrote? This wastes everyone’s time and is against HN guidelines.

I don’t appreciate your sarcastic and snarky final penultimate sentence. If you reread my comment, you probably can see that I would agree there is no one perfect legal entity.

> Why do you assume Mitchell is just doing this without any research or reasoning?

I said nothing of the kind.

> Your laundry list of everything that might possibly go wrong with an open software project is not exactly useful.

I didn’t make any such laundry list (or even a list).

Saying “… that only you can see. Enjoy!” at the end of this is more than unkind; it is a jerk move.

Taken as a whole, the comment above isn’t just uncharitable; it mischaracterizes my comment completely and consistently.