Just because a phrase appears, doesn't lead to what you said. "UNESCO" appears once, but no where says UN people "are being brought in to administer it".

Those are real words, that’s true. The following however is anywhere from not true to wild speculation without any factual basis.

>Global responsibility sounds like the direct opposite of self-determination.

>Some United Nations NGO bureaucrats being brought in to administer it, without acknowledging local knowledge. Getting UNESCO to administer it is not "honoring indigenous traditions"

>Also "store carbon", is more cargo cult pop science.

>They are probably trying to refer to trapping and reducing carbon dioxide emissions, but this is a misleading way of doing so.