logoalt Hacker News

alex1138yesterday at 8:31 PM2 repliesview on HN

Youtube has been repeatedly told about videos that are abusive towards children and they do nothing about it. They're not interested in effective solutions


Replies

Benderyesterday at 8:39 PM

Youtube has been repeatedly told about videos that are abusive towards children and they do nothing about it. They're not interested in effective solutions

Youtube is user-generated content which is precisely why I would prefer they add an RTA header. Random people uploading videos can claim to be kid friendly when they are not. Take that responsibility away from the uploaders and away from Youtube and hand it to the parents. Less work, liability and cost for Youtube should be a nifty incentive at the risk of blocking some advertising to children which is another loaded topic all together.

show 1 reply
oerstedyesterday at 10:27 PM

I mean they have invested a ton into their kid-friendly mode and there have been quite a number of “adpocalips” where ad revenue for many content creators was dramatically slashed due to YouTube’s over-zealous moderation.

It is a serious business concern, there are occasional panics triggered by consumers complaining that a brand ad is shown next to and benefits from the attention of some distasteful content, and they start to bleed important advertisers on mass. YouTube then proceeds to get defensive and demonetizes (removes all ads from) or tags as adult-only any video that may be concerning, where avoiding false negatives takes much more precedence over avoiding false positives.

Of course this is not directly tied to protecting children, but this incentive structure is partly aligned and it is a strong one.