logoalt Hacker News

BLKNSLVRyesterday at 11:22 PM1 replyview on HN

I believe that's the wrong angle to be looking at it since you're starting from the perspective of someone trying to sell something.

The 'need' end is the perspective that's most useful to society. How can someone who has a need find out to satisfy it?

Make your product able to be found by those who need it. Don't shove it in the faces of everyone.

One problem with the above is the effectiveness of making 'unnecessary' sales by creating fomo by shoving it in the faces of everyone. This effectiveness, however, is evidence of the fact that it's psychological manipulation / abuse.


Replies

themafiayesterday at 11:31 PM

> Make your product able to be found by those who need it.

I think you'd need to more directly and clearly define "need." Do you mean only utilitarian companies and products should exist? What about the things I don't "need" but just "like?" What about music? How do I find new music? How do I know I like something before I've even discovered it? Should music radio, which is just an abstract form of album advertising, not exist at all?

I'm torturing the point, but outside of centralized market control, I'm not sure you can apply this logic across the entire scope of capitalism.