logoalt Hacker News

frankestlast Sunday at 4:38 AM4 repliesview on HN

DreamWeaver absolutely destroyed the code with all kinds of tags and unnecessary stuff. Especially if you used the visual editor. It was fun for brainstorming but plain notepad with clean understandable code was far far better (and with the browser compatibility issues the only option if you were going to production).


Replies

christophiluslast Sunday at 5:19 AM

After 25 or so years doing this, I think there are two kinds of developers: craftsmen and practical “does it get the job done” types. I’m the former. The latter seem to be what makes the world go round.

show 5 replies
chrisweeklylast Sunday at 5:38 AM

The HTML generated by Dreamweaver's WYSIWYG mode might not have been ideal, but it was far superior to the mess produced by MS Front Page. With Dreamweave, it was at least possible to use it as a starting point.

msephtonlast Sunday at 11:19 AM

Judicious and careful use of Dreamweaver (its visual editor and properties bar) enabled me to write exactly the code I wanted. I used Dreamweaver foot table layouts and Home Site (later Top Style) for broader code edits. At that time I was famous with the company for being able to make any layout. Good times!

BobbyTables2last Sunday at 6:39 AM

MS FrontPage also went out of its way to do the same.

show 2 replies