Yes, training is considered fair use, and output is non-copyrightable / public domain. With many asterix and footnotes, of course.
Don't see how output being public domain makes sense when they could be outputting copyrighted code.
Shouldn't the right's extend forward and simply require the LLM code to be deleted?
Don't see how output being public domain makes sense when they could be outputting copyrighted code.
Shouldn't the right's extend forward and simply require the LLM code to be deleted?