> If a scientist uses an LLM to write a paper with fabricated citations - that’s a crappy scientist.
Really? Regardless of whether it's a good paper?
Citations are a key part of the paper. If the paper isn’t supported by the citations, it’s not a good paper.
How is it a good paper if the info in it cant be trusted lmao
Citations are a key part of the paper. If the paper isn’t supported by the citations, it’s not a good paper.