alt Hacker NewsThis is not the riposte you might think it is. Duplication serves a different purpose in print; it lets you avoid having to pass the memo around.
This is not the riposte you might think it is. Duplication serves a different purpose in print; it lets you avoid having to pass the memo around.
I think the riposte is against the word "always" and it worked precisely because one could blindly pick a counter example from the physical space of the discussion.
I.e. it worked because it smashed the broad statement and forced a discussion about particulars. Now who was right about those, I have no idea, since I wasn't even present.