logoalt Hacker News

PaulRobinsonlast Sunday at 5:07 PM3 repliesview on HN

The half-life of Apple kit is so high, they are arguably a lot more sustainable than their repairable PC counterparts.

Apple laptops I have that boot include a 2007 iBook (my folks used it until this Summer and then bank websites would stop working with the Chrome browser they could get working on it), which I'll be putting a BSD or Linux distro on over Christmas, a 2012 Intel MBP that has Linux on it and a couple of 2015-2017 era MBPs that I inherited via one means or another.

I'm typing this on an M4 MacBook Air I picked up cheap during Black Friday sales. I fully expect it to still be functional in 10 years.

I don't think I've ever had a PC laptop last close to that.


Replies

fortylast Monday at 10:54 PM

My experience of being one of the only dev with a Linux/Lenovo laptop in a company where everyone else has Macs, is that my Thinkpad from 2018 outlived all the Macs from the same period, most of which had become overheating helicopters.

2b3a51last Sunday at 5:34 PM

Posting from a Thinkpad X61s laptop (Jan 2008) running Trisquel Linux 11.

(I take your point that I would not be able to participate in this discussion using the original operating system that came with this laptop).

show 1 reply
AuthAuthlast Monday at 12:26 AM

The half life is no different. Apple doesnt use higher quality parts. Thats just perception from their premium product marketing.

Every time I see this comparison its always "My $3000 apple laptop is still usable after 5 years while my $700 chromebook is slow after 4 years".