LLMs can actually make up for their negative contributions. They could go through all the references of all papers and verify them, assuming someone would also look into what gets flagged for that final seal of disapproval.
But this would be more powerfull with an open knowledge base where all papers and citation verifications were registered, so that all the effort put into verification could be reused, and errors propagated through the citation chain.
>LLMs can actually make up for their negative contributions. They could go through all the references of all papers and verify them,
They will just hallucinate their existence. I have tried this before