logoalt Hacker News

johncolanduonilast Monday at 10:23 PM2 repliesview on HN

It is if they’re in the same physical datacenter. Usually the way this is done is to wait for at least M replicas to fsync, but only require the data to be in memory for the rest. It smooths out the tail latencies, which are quite high for SSDs.


Replies

loeglast Tuesday at 12:35 AM

> It smooths out the tail latencies, which are quite high for SSDs.

I'm sorry, tail latencies are high for SSDs? In my experience, the tail latencies are much higher for traditional rotating media (tens of seconds, vs 10s of milliseconds for SSDs).

show 1 reply
senderistalast Monday at 10:51 PM

You can push the safety envelope a bit further and wait for your data to only be in memory in N separate fault domains. Yes, your favorite ultra-reliable cloud service may be doing this.