logoalt Hacker News

Daneel_yesterday at 3:39 PM7 repliesview on HN

It says two years of average use.

“Two” is not “years” in my opinion. “Years” implies at least 3-5.


Replies

zuckedyesterday at 3:49 PM

Years is literally just the plural of a single year. Ergo, years feels like the appropriate word here. What are you suggesting they phase it as instead?

show 2 replies
koinedadyesterday at 3:42 PM

Two is definitely on the low end for “years”… really the lowest.

But I did have a similar thought when I read it was only “two”

apparentyesterday at 4:11 PM

Two is years. Some people would even say that 1.5 is "years". I go back and forth on this. Is it correct to say that something costs "thousands of dollars" if it costs $1,800? If it costs $2,000, IMO it's clear.

show 1 reply
pavo-etctoday at 5:04 AM

If English is your first language, this is the funniest comment I've seen today by a margin.

show 1 reply
jbstackyesterday at 4:22 PM

> It says two years of average use.

Even this is misleading. The product hasn't been released yet. So what is it an average of? How do you know how people will use it?

ModernMechyesterday at 3:52 PM

2 years: Couple years

3 years: Few years

4 years: Several years

5+ years: Years

show 1 reply
andrelaszloyesterday at 3:43 PM

"Two year of average use"?

show 1 reply