logoalt Hacker News

michaelcampbellyesterday at 4:21 PM7 repliesview on HN

Related: Comments saying "this feels like AI". It's this generation's "Looks shopped" and of zero value, IMO.


Replies

whimsicalismyesterday at 4:29 PM

Disagree, find these comments valuable - especially if they are about an article that I was about to read. It's not the same as sockpuppeting accusations, which I think are right to be banned.

show 2 replies
sbrotheryesterday at 4:29 PM

Fair, but then that functionality should be built into the flagging system. Obvious AI comments (worse, ones that are commercially driven) are a cancer that's breaking online discussion forums.

show 1 reply
yodonyesterday at 4:39 PM

> Comments saying "this feels like AI" should be banned.

Strong agree.

If you can make an actually reliable AI detector, stop wasting time posting comments on forums and just monetize it to make yourself rich.

If you can't, accept that you can't, and stop wasting everyone else's time with your unvalidated guesses about whether something is AI or not.

The least valuable lowest signal comments are "this feels like AI." Worse, they never raise the quality of the discussion about the article.

It's "does anyone else hate those scroll bars" and "this site shouldn't require JavaScript" for a new generation.

show 2 replies
ruudayesterday at 4:36 PM

I find them helpful. It happens semi-regularly now that I read something that was upvoted, but after a few sentences I think "hmm, something feels off", and after the first two paragraphs I suspect it's AI slop. Then I go to the comments, and it turns out others noticed too. Sometimes I worry that I'm becoming too paranoid in a world where human-written content feels increasingly rare, and it's good to know it's not me going crazy.

In one recent case (the slop article about adenosine signalling) a commenter had a link to the original paper that the slop was engagement-farming about. I found that comment very helpful.

8organicbitsyesterday at 5:55 PM

One of my recent blog posts got a comment like that, and I tried to reframe it as "this is poorly written", and took the opportunity to solicit constructive criticism and to reflect on my style. I think my latest post improved, and I'm glad I adjusted my style.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45652349

show 2 replies
djeastmyesterday at 5:54 PM

I disagree. Traditional netiquette when downvoting something is to explain why.

Analemma_yesterday at 6:19 PM

Strong disagree: these comments (if they lay out their case persuasively) allow me to skip the content completely, and save me a lot of time. They provide lots of value, and in fact there should be social rewards for the work of wading through value-free slop to save others from having to do so.