logoalt Hacker News

burningChromeyesterday at 8:20 PM1 replyview on HN

>> Historically the strength of Apple was that they didn't ship things until they actually worked. Meaning that the technology was there and ready to make an experience that was truly excellent.

They dragged their feet on a host of technologies that other handset makers adopted, released and subsequently improved.

- USB C charging

- 90hz, 120Hz refresh rates

- wireless charging

- larger batteries (the iPhone 17 still lags behind Samsung and Google)

I'm not sure what happened, but the iPhone used to have the most fluid, responsive experience compared to Android. Now, both Google and Samsung have surpassed them in that regard.

I've used both Android and have owned several iPhones and it just seems like its not an issue of releasing something that isn't ready, but more about them not being capable enough to release phones to compete with other phones that are regularly beating them in the specs race.


Replies

culitoday at 1:18 AM

This isn't necessarily a counterargument. Apple's always been conservative with their specs but their tight link between software and hardware has meant they've been able to do more with less. Batteries are a good example of that. Apple has always had a much smaller battery than flagship competitors but has had similar or better battery life than, say, Samsung