It has not been my experience that individual owner landlords have been better than institutional owners!
Anyways, I was just calling out that your logic didn't appear to hold. The right response to the comment that roots this subthread is "institutional landlords are not generally a thing". Again: the median number of properties a California corporate landlord lets out is 1.
>your logic
I didn't write any other comment here :)
But, anyways:
>It has not been my experience that individual owner landlords have been better than institutional owners!
My experience has been different than yours, in that case!
Not sure the median makes sense for this argument. Say 51% of corporate landlords let out 1 property, and 49% let out 100 - most people will live in a property owned by the 49%. The absolute number of landlords in the 51% would be mostly meaningless.