logoalt Hacker News

wbllast Tuesday at 11:51 PM1 replyview on HN

It was used correctly. What CAs wanted to sell wasn't something browsers wanted to support, and EV was the compromise. It just happens that what EV meant wasn't that useful irl.


Replies

crotelast Wednesday at 12:05 AM

What's the alternative, showing the company's unique registration ID?

CAs invented EVs because the wanted to sell something which could make them more money than DVs. The fact that company names aren't unique means that the whole concept was fundamentally flawed from the start: there is no identifier which is both human-readable and guaranteed to uniquely identify an entity. They wanted to sell something which can't exist. The closest thing we have got is... domain names.

show 1 reply