logoalt Hacker News

iamnothere12/10/20251 replyview on HN

The Atlantic summarizes the situation somewhat but with perhaps too much brevity: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/10/democra...

Evidence: I was there, do your own research if you care so much. This isn’t a formal debate, and anyone who has eyes, ears, and a brain can figure it out.

You keep shouting demagogue, demagogue! As if anyone outside of the political class cares. Solve the people’s problems or there will be more (and worse) demagogues. It’s your only option.


Replies

estearum12/10/2025

We don't disagree that that's my (as someone on the anti-Trump side) only reasonable option.

Where we disagree is your assertion that that is the necessary and sufficient solution.

Those are entirely distinct claims.

People have won elections for a long long time without pragmatic solutions to real problems (case in point: 2024). You have basically zero evidence this is even a relevant point in elections whatsoever.

The actual necessary solution is entirely on the GOP's side. So long as they're in the throes of a cult of personality, then a sufficiently large part of the electorate will be immune to logic.

And yes: this is very bad. It is a deeply inconvenient fact, but the inconvenience of it does not render it less factual.

show 1 reply