Here is an example of the Builder pattern that illustrates my point: https://www.baeldung.com/java-builder-pattern#bd-classic-bui...
Let’s remove the category argument and you get this:
Post post = new Post.Builder()
.title("Java Builder Pattern")
.text("Explaining how to implement the Builder Pattern in Java")
.build();
This builder is a more readable alternative to this: Post post = new Post("Java Builder Pattern", "Explaining how to implement the Builder Pattern in Java", null);
But if Java supported named arguments and default values (the default would be null), this could just be: Post post = new Post(title: "Java Builder Pattern", text: "Explaining how to implement the Builder Pattern in Java");
Funny part is that Java does have named parameters, but only for annotations!