Twinlaw's father is a super famous electrical engineer, retired professor emeritus with hundreds of papers (often as first) published author.

Be careful asking him about anything "he's published" since the mid-90s — because he often won't know anything about the topic. Instead, some grad-student lists you first to draw publicity to his own subordinate PhD / thesis.

After inventing a monumental concept in EE microchip design, you can just sort of rest on your laurels, just because of your name recognition (with permission, of course).

But after myself dropping out of grad school, decades ago, I've shared many lazy whiskeys with former colleagues, contemplating the "what if"s of two traveled old men. I regret nothing but happily engaged laziness.

> Graduate students aren't cited for coming up with innovations

Nonsense.

> the controversy is valid,

No. You can see both publications right here [1]. Watson and Crick explicitly say they are aware of the "general nature" of Franklin's results, but they are the only ones in that issue to propose the double helix structure with the specific features that explained all of the evidence, published and unpublished.

[1] https://www.mskcc.org/teaser/1953-nature-papers-watson-crick...