The overuse of emoji make me suspect it's AI. I plugged first paragraph into pangram and result is 100% AI.
https://www.pangram.com/history/30310094-f54b-4e74-8d68-e4c9...
The article also lacks any personal opinion or experience on the matter. It just stated a bunch of pointless stats and "facts". Almost every single point is refutable depending on the task at hand.
Sad that obvious AI slop like this gets to the front page
The article also lacks any personal opinion or experience on the matter. It just stated a bunch of pointless stats and "facts". Almost every single point is refutable depending on the task at hand.