alt Hacker NewsBut you are now arguing against a strawman, namely, "it is not possible to construct a computer that thinks".
The argument that was actually made was "LLMs do not think".
But you are now arguing against a strawman, namely, "it is not possible to construct a computer that thinks".
The argument that was actually made was "LLMs do not think".
A: X, because Y
B: But Y would also imply Z
C: A was never arguing for Z! This is a strawman!