IMHO "efficient" isn't really the right term in your second para. The PV generation per W incoming is actually a little lower at higher ambient temperatures, but is otherwise fairly constant.
I assume that you mean higher kWh/y/kWp, ie you get more generation out of a given solar panel in the south each year.
I meant kw h/m^2/d I think, but I'm not sure what the simplest way to say that is
I think you and I are saying the same thing though!
"Effective" might be the better word.
It's unfortunate that "efficiency" has both engineering and economic definitions.