> But, at least with Google you can use hardware without the binding software requirement.
For now, but they are tightening things up.
And at least with Apple they provide convenient end-to-end cloud syncing. Google doesn't.
(And this back and forth can go on for a long time...)
You are just picking what is important to you and then ignoring other issues. That isn't how to craft advice that helps people you don't personally know, with needs you are completely unaware of, in a complex domain.
> And at least with Apple they provide convenient end-to-end cloud syncing. Google doesn't.
What?
In fact you have more (and better) options on an Android based device.
> That isn't how to craft advice that helps people you don't personally know, with needs you are completely unaware of, in a complex domain.
Cool story. But it's OK for you to craft advice on a topic you're not well versed in (cloud sync)? Seems like you're ignoring some issues and misunderstanding needs that you're completely unaware of in a pretty straightforward domain.